Learn how Koru and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Stars
29Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
25 daysVersion
v0.1.4License
MPL-2.0Repository
koruworks/mono
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.8.9License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
siyuan-note/siyuan
SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Koru, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Koru in community adoption with 47,030 stars compared to 29 stars on GitHub. This 1621.7x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 3,093 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Koru last updated 4 hours ago and SiYuan 5 hours ago.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Koru which began 25 days ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Koru is licensed under MPL-2.0 while SiYuan uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
SiYuan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Koru may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs