Learn how Beaver Notes and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.

Auto-fetched .

SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Beaver Notes, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Beaver Notes in community adoption with 42,949 stars compared to 1,226 stars on GitHub. This 35.0x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,720 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Beaver Notes last updated 1 day ago and SiYuan 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Beaver Notes uses JSX, Vue while SiYuan leverages Bash, Python, Golang.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Beaver Notes which began 3 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
Beaver Notes uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SiYuan's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Beaver Notes also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
SiYuan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Beaver Notes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs