Learn how AnyType and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.57.4Repository
anyproto/anytype-ts
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.8.8License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
siyuan-note/siyuan
SiYuan appears to have several advantages over AnyType, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces AnyType in community adoption with 46,902 stars compared to 8,981 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 3,085 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
AnyType is growing faster, adding 136 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 425 stars for SiYuan (+0.9%). AnyType is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AnyType last updated 16 hours ago and SiYuan 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AnyType uses JSX while SiYuan leverages CSS.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to AnyType which began 3 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
SiYuan is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while AnyType's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
SiYuan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while AnyType may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs