Learn how AnyType and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.57.4Repository
anyproto/anytype-ts
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
2.12.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
silverbullet
Silverbullet appears to have several advantages over AnyType, particularly in growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with AnyType having 9,002 stars and Silverbullet having 6,387 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, AnyType has 603 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Silverbullet is growing faster, adding 226 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 149 stars for AnyType (+1.7%). Silverbullet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AnyType last updated 3 days ago and Silverbullet 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AnyType uses Python, Golang while Silverbullet leverages Rust, Lua.
Silverbullet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to AnyType which began 3 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Silverbullet may have more mature features and established processes.
Silverbullet is licensed under MIT, while AnyType's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Silverbullet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while AnyType may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs