Learn how Darkwrite and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Silverbullet appears to have several advantages over Darkwrite, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Silverbullet significantly outpaces Darkwrite in community adoption with 5,928 stars compared to 311 stars on GitHub. This 19.1x difference suggests Silverbullet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Silverbullet has 471 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Darkwrite is growing faster, adding 14 stars in the last 30 days (+4.7%) against adding 112 stars for Silverbullet (+1.9%). Darkwrite is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darkwrite last updated 11 hours ago and Silverbullet 19 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Darkwrite beginning 4 years ago and Silverbullet 5 years ago.
Silverbullet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Darkwrite's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Darkwrite also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes while Silverbullet extends into Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Silverbullet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Darkwrite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs