Learn how Memos and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Memos and Silverbullet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memos significantly outpaces Silverbullet in community adoption with 63,538 stars compared to 6,223 stars on GitHub. This 10.2x difference suggests Memos has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,812 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Silverbullet is growing faster, adding 223 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 763 stars for Memos (+1.2%). Silverbullet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Memos last updated 3 days ago and Silverbullet 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Memos uses CSS, Golang while Silverbullet leverages SCSS, Rust, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Memos beginning 5 years ago and Silverbullet 5 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Memos also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Memos and Silverbullet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs