Learn how Notesnook and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Notesnook and Silverbullet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Notesnook leads in popularity with 14,472 stars vs 5,928 stars for Silverbullet. The 144% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Notesnook has 990 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Silverbullet is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 136 stars for Notesnook (+0.9%). Silverbullet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Notesnook last updated 2 days ago and Silverbullet 19 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Notesnook beginning 5 years ago and Silverbullet 5 years ago.
Silverbullet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Notesnook's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Notesnook also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Notesnook and Silverbullet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs