Learn how Joplin and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Joplin and Silverbullet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces Silverbullet in community adoption with 56,114 stars compared to 5,928 stars on GitHub. This 9.5x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,246 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Silverbullet is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 363 stars for Joplin (+0.7%). Silverbullet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 20 hours ago and Silverbullet 19 hours ago.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Silverbullet which began 5 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Silverbullet is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Joplin and Silverbullet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs