What is the main difference between Joplin and Silverbullet?

Joplin and Silverbullet are both note-taking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Joplin or Silverbullet?

The choice between Joplin and Silverbullet depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Joplin to Silverbullet?

Migration between Joplin and Silverbullet is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Joplin vs Silverbullet

Learn how Joplin and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.

Joplin

Cross-platform note-taking app with end-to-end encryption, Markdown support, web clipping, and sync via Dropbox, OneDrive, or Joplin Cloud.

Visit Joplin Read more

56,876stars+383(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v3.7.21
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
laurent22/joplin

Silverbullet

A self-hosted, browser-based note-taking system that turns plain Markdown pages into a queryable, scriptable knowledge base you control.

Visit Silverbullet Read more

6,387stars+226(+3.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.12.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
silverbullet

Detailed Comparison

Both Joplin and Silverbullet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Joplin wins

Community & Popularity

Joplin significantly outpaces Silverbullet in community adoption with 56,876 stars compared to 6,387 stars on GitHub. This 8.9x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,371 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Silverbullet wins

Growth Momentum

Silverbullet is growing faster, adding 226 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 383 stars for Joplin (+0.7%). Silverbullet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 14 hours ago and Silverbullet 4 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses CSS, Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while Silverbullet leverages Lua.

Joplin wins

Project Maturity

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Silverbullet which began 5 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Silverbullet wins

Licensing

Silverbullet is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Comparable