What is the main difference between Joplin and Zen?

Joplin and Zen are both note-taking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Joplin or Zen?

The choice between Joplin and Zen depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Joplin to Zen?

Migration between Joplin and Zen is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Visit Docmost

Learn more

Joplin vs Zen

Learn how Joplin and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.

Joplin

Cross-platform note-taking app with end-to-end encryption, Markdown support, web clipping, and sync via Dropbox, OneDrive, or Joplin Cloud.

Visit Joplin Read more

Stars
55,039
Forks
6,134
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
9 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Zen

Minimal note-taking app storing Markdown notes in local SQLite database. Features instant search, flexible tagging, keyboard shortcuts, and offline access.

Visit Zen Read more

Stars
1,089
Forks
61
Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
1 year
License
AGPL-3.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Joplin appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Joplin wins

Community & Popularity

Joplin significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 55,039 stars compared to 1,089 stars on GitHub. This 50.5x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,134 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Joplin wins

Development Activity

Joplin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Zen was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Joplin is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, C++, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB while Zen leverages Golang.

Joplin wins

Project Maturity

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Zen which began 1 year ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Zen wins

Licensing

Zen is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Joplin wins

Hosting & Deployment

Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Zen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.