Learn how itsnotes and Joplin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Both itsnotes and Joplin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces itsnotes in community adoption with 55,376 stars compared to 10 stars on GitHub. This 5537.6x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,166 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with itsnotes last updated 17 hours ago and Joplin 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin leverages Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to itsnotes which began 23 days ago. This 9.5-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
itsnotes is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes. However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin extends into Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both itsnotes and Joplin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs