Learn how itsnotes and Standard Notes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
3.202.11License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
standardnotes/app
Both itsnotes and Standard Notes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Standard Notes significantly outpaces itsnotes in community adoption with 6,690 stars compared to 42 stars on GitHub. This 159.3x difference suggests Standard Notes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Standard Notes has 565 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with itsnotes last updated 15 hours ago and Standard Notes 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Standard Notes leverages SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Standard Notes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to itsnotes which began 5 months ago. This 9.6-year head start suggests Standard Notes may have more mature features and established processes.
itsnotes uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Standard Notes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both itsnotes and Standard Notes offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs