Learn how Darkwrite and Standard Notes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
3.202.10License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
standardnotes/app
Standard Notes appears to have several advantages over Darkwrite, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Standard Notes significantly outpaces Darkwrite in community adoption with 6,681 stars compared to 319 stars on GitHub. This 20.9x difference suggests Standard Notes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Standard Notes has 562 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Darkwrite and Standard Notes are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 49 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darkwrite last updated 8 days ago and Standard Notes 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Darkwrite uses Next.js while Standard Notes leverages SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Standard Notes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Darkwrite which began 5 years ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Standard Notes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Standard Notes provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Darkwrite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs