Learn how Standard Notes and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Standard Notes and Zen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Standard Notes significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 6,626 stars compared to 1,173 stars on GitHub. This 5.6x difference suggests Standard Notes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Standard Notes has 551 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Zen is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 46 stars for Standard Notes (+0.7%). Zen is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Standard Notes last updated 2 days ago and Zen 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Standard Notes uses Bash, Typescript, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while Zen leverages Golang.
Standard Notes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Zen which began 2 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests Standard Notes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Standard Notes also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Standard Notes and Zen offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs