Learn how Notesnook and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Notesnook appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Notesnook significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 14,688 stars compared to 1,178 stars on GitHub. This 12.5x difference suggests Notesnook has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Notesnook has 1,013 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Notesnook is growing faster, adding 206 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 12 stars for Zen (+1%). Notesnook is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Notesnook last updated 2 days ago and Zen 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Notesnook uses Typescript, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Remix while Zen leverages Golang.
Notesnook has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Zen which began 2 years ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Notesnook may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Notesnook is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zen uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Notesnook also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Notesnook and Zen offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs