Learn how Blinko and Notesnook differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Notesnook appears to have several advantages over Blinko, particularly in growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Blinko having 11,055 stars and Notesnook having 14,710 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Notesnook has 1,025 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Notesnook is growing faster, adding 222 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 70 stars for Blinko (+0.6%). Notesnook is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Notesnook shows more recent development activity with its last commit 15 hours ago, while Blinko was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Notesnook is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Blinko uses Bash, Rust, Tauri while Notesnook leverages C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, MATLAB, Remix.
Notesnook has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Blinko which began 2 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Notesnook may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Notesnook extends into Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Blinko and Notesnook offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs