Learn how Blinko and Memos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Memos appears to have several advantages over Blinko, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memos significantly outpaces Blinko in community adoption with 62,942 stars compared to 11,009 stars on GitHub. This 5.7x difference suggests Memos has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,743 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Blinko and Memos are moving at much the same rate, adding 143 stars and adding 718 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Blinko last updated 17 days ago and Memos 23 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Blinko uses Rust, Kotlin, Tauri while Memos leverages Golang.
Memos has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Blinko which began 2 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Memos may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Blinko's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Memos extends into Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Blinko and Memos offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs