Learn how Blinko and OpenNotas differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Blinko appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Blinko significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 11,009 stars compared to 178 stars on GitHub. This 61.8x difference suggests Blinko has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Blinko has 776 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Blinko is growing faster, adding 143 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 1 stars for OpenNotas (+0.6%). Blinko is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Blinko last updated 17 days ago and OpenNotas 1 month ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Blinko uses Bash, JSX, Rust, Kotlin, Tauri while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Blinko beginning 2 years ago and OpenNotas 2 years ago.
Blinko is licensed under GPL-3.0, while OpenNotas's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenNotas extends into Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Blinko provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs