Learn how Blinko and OpenNotas differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Blinko appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Blinko significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 10,939 stars compared to 178 stars on GitHub. This 61.5x difference suggests Blinko has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Blinko has 771 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Blinko and OpenNotas are moving at much the same rate, adding 161 stars and adding 3 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.5% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Blinko last updated 21 days ago and OpenNotas 18 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Blinko uses Bash, JSX, Rust, Kotlin, Tauri while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Blinko beginning 2 years ago and OpenNotas 2 years ago.
Blinko is licensed under GPL-3.0, while OpenNotas's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenNotas extends into Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Blinko provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs