Logseq significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 44,230 stars compared to 176 stars on GitHub. This 251.3x difference suggests Logseq has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Logseq has 2,748 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Logseq last updated 9 hours ago and OpenNotas 2 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logseq uses Bash, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Clojure while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.

Logseq has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to OpenNotas which began 2 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Logseq may have more mature features and established processes.

Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while OpenNotas's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenNotas extends into Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Logseq provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.