Learn how Logseq and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Logseq and SiYuan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logseq and SiYuan show comparable community engagement with 44,574 and 45,943 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,960 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logseq and SiYuan are moving at much the same rate, adding 509 stars and adding 552 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.2% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logseq last updated 10 hours ago and SiYuan 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logseq uses JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Clojure while SiYuan leverages Python, SCSS, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Logseq beginning 6 years ago and SiYuan 6 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both Logseq and SiYuan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs