Learn how Logseq and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
2.0.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logseq/logseq
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.8.8License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
siyuan-note/siyuan
Both Logseq and SiYuan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logseq and SiYuan show comparable community engagement with 45,347 and 46,902 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 3,085 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logseq and SiYuan are moving at much the same rate, adding 314 stars and adding 425 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logseq last updated 9 hours ago and SiYuan 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logseq uses JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Clojure while SiYuan leverages Python, Golang, SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Logseq beginning 6 years ago and SiYuan 6 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both Logseq and SiYuan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs