Learn how Blinko and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Blinko, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Blinko in community adoption with 42,949 stars compared to 10,114 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,720 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Blinko last updated 10 days ago and SiYuan 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Blinko uses JSX, Rust, Kotlin, Tauri while SiYuan leverages Python, SCSS, Golang.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Blinko which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Blinko is licensed under GPL-3.0 while SiYuan uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both Blinko and SiYuan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs