Learn how Blinko and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Silverbullet appears to have several advantages over Blinko, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Blinko leads in popularity with 10,955 stars vs 5,928 stars for Silverbullet. The 85% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Blinko has 774 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Silverbullet is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 163 stars for Blinko (+1.5%). Silverbullet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Blinko last updated 2 days ago and Silverbullet 19 hours ago.
Silverbullet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Blinko which began 2 years ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests Silverbullet may have more mature features and established processes.
Silverbullet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Blinko's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both Blinko and Silverbullet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs