Learn how AppFlowy and Silverbullet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these personal knowledge management (pkm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both AppFlowy and Silverbullet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AppFlowy significantly outpaces Silverbullet in community adoption with 75,969 stars compared to 5,928 stars on GitHub. This 12.8x difference suggests AppFlowy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, AppFlowy has 5,914 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
AppFlowy and Silverbullet are moving at much the same rate, adding 1,611 stars and adding 112 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.2% vs +1.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppFlowy last updated 16 days ago and Silverbullet 19 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with AppFlowy beginning 5 years ago and Silverbullet 5 years ago.
Silverbullet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than AppFlowy's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: AppFlowy also focuses on Task Management, Collaborative Notes & Wikis while Silverbullet extends into Note-Taking.
Both AppFlowy and Silverbullet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs