Learn how AppFlowy and Logseq differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these personal knowledge management (pkm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both AppFlowy and Logseq have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AppFlowy leads in popularity with 75,883 stars vs 44,574 stars for Logseq. The 70% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, AppFlowy has 5,901 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
AppFlowy is growing faster, adding 1,636 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 509 stars for Logseq (+1.2%). AppFlowy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppFlowy last updated 13 days ago and Logseq 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppFlowy uses Rust, C++, Dart while Logseq leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Clojure.
Logseq has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to AppFlowy which began 5 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Logseq may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: AppFlowy also focuses on Task Management, Collaborative Notes & Wikis while Logseq extends into Note-Taking.
Both AppFlowy and Logseq offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs