What is the main difference between Joplin and Logseq?

Joplin and Logseq are both note-taking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Joplin or Logseq?

The choice between Joplin and Logseq depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Joplin to Logseq?

Migration between Joplin and Logseq is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Joplin vs Logseq

Learn how Joplin and Logseq differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.

Joplin

Cross-platform note-taking app with end-to-end encryption, Markdown support, web clipping, and sync via Dropbox, OneDrive, or Joplin Cloud.

Visit Joplin Read more

56,065stars+351(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v3.6.16
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
laurent22/joplin

Sponsor Joplin ongithub.com

Logseq

Local-first, open-source knowledge management tool with bidirectional linking, outlines, flashcards, PDF annotations, and whiteboards for building a connected second brain.

Visit Logseq Read more

44,574stars+509(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
2.0.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
logseq/logseq

Sponsor Logseq onopencollective.com

Detailed Comparison

Both Joplin and Logseq have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Joplin having 56,065 stars and Logseq having 44,574 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,245 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Logseq wins

Growth Momentum

Logseq is growing faster, adding 509 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 351 stars for Joplin (+0.6%). Logseq is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 9 hours ago and Logseq 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Python, SCSS, Rust, C++, Ruby while Logseq leverages Clojure.

Joplin wins

Project Maturity

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Logseq which began 6 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Logseq wins

Licensing

Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Comparable