Joplin vs Notesnook

Joplin significantly outpaces Notesnook in community adoption with 56,850 stars compared to 14,820 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,363 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Notesnook is growing faster, adding 195 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 373 stars for Joplin (+0.7%). Notesnook is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 10 hours ago and Notesnook 19 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, Python, SCSS, Rust, C++ while Notesnook leverages Remix.

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Notesnook which began 6 years ago. This 4.3-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Notesnook is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Both Joplin and Notesnook offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.