Learn how Joplin and Notesnook differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Joplin and Notesnook have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces Notesnook in community adoption with 54,477 stars compared to 13,959 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,069 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 19 hours ago and Notesnook 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, Python, SCSS, Rust, C++ while Notesnook leverages Remix.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Notesnook which began 5 years ago. This 4.3-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Notesnook is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Joplin and Notesnook offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs