Learn how Memos and Notesnook differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Memos appears to have several advantages over Notesnook, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memos significantly outpaces Notesnook in community adoption with 62,463 stars compared to 14,455 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests Memos has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,688 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Memos and Notesnook are moving at much the same rate, adding 695 stars and adding 126 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Memos last updated 15 hours ago and Notesnook 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Memos uses Bash, Golang while Notesnook leverages C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Remix.
Both projects started around the same time, with Memos beginning 5 years ago and Notesnook 5 years ago.
Memos uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Notesnook's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Memos and Notesnook offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs