Learn how Darkwrite and Memos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.31.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
usememos/memos
Memos appears to have several advantages over Darkwrite, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memos significantly outpaces Darkwrite in community adoption with 64,025 stars compared to 319 stars on GitHub. This 200.7x difference suggests Memos has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,882 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Darkwrite and Memos are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 740 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darkwrite last updated 8 days ago and Memos 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Darkwrite uses Next.js while Memos leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Darkwrite beginning 5 years ago and Memos 5 years ago.
Memos uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Darkwrite's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes. However, they also have distinct specializations: Memos extends into Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Memos provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Darkwrite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs