Learn how Memos and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Memos appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memos significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 60,804 stars compared to 1,110 stars on GitHub. This 54.8x difference suggests Memos has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,472 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Memos shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Zen was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Memos is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Memos uses Bash, Typescript.
Memos has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Zen which began 1 year ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Memos may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Zen's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Memos also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Memos provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Zen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs