Learn how OpenNotas and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Zen appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zen significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 1,178 stars compared to 179 stars on GitHub. This 6.6x difference suggests Zen has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zen has 63 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Zen is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 1 stars for OpenNotas (+0.6%). Zen is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Zen shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while OpenNotas was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Zen is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenNotas uses Typescript, Vue, Nuxt.js while Zen leverages JSX, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenNotas beginning 2 years ago and Zen 2 years ago.
Zen is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while OpenNotas's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenNotas also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Zen provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs