Ad
 
Learn more

Mattermost vs Stoat

Learn how Mattermost and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost provides a flexible, open-source platform for secure team collaboration, designed for organizations with strict security and privacy requirements.
  • Stars


    36,323
  • Forks


    8,547
  • Last commit


    12 hours ago
  • Repository age


    11 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Mattermost
Favicon of Stoat

Stoat

Modern chat platform featuring text channels, community building tools, fine-grained permissions, and complete privacy protection. Open-source and ad-free.
  • Stars


    2,971
  • Forks


    344
  • Last commit


    3 days ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Stoat

Detailed Comparison

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Mattermost wins
Community & Popularity

Mattermost significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 36,323 stars compared to 2,971 stars on GitHub. This 12.2x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,547 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 12 hours ago and Stoat 3 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang while Stoat leverages Python, Rust.

Mattermost wins
Project Maturity

Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces.

Mattermost wins
Hosting & Deployment

Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Stoat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.