Learn how Mattermost and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .


Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 36,323 stars compared to 2,971 stars on GitHub. This 12.2x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,547 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 12 hours ago and Stoat 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang while Stoat leverages Python, Rust.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces.
Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Stoat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs