Learn how Mattermost and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Mattermost and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 38,949 stars compared to 3,270 stars on GitHub. This 11.9x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,960 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Stoat is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 318 stars for Mattermost (+0.8%). Stoat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 4 hours ago and Stoat 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang while Stoat leverages Python, Rust.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Mattermost and Stoat offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs