Learn how Quiet and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
11.3.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
tryquiet/quiet
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.16.2Self-hosted
YesRepository
stoatchat/stoatchat
Both Quiet and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Quiet having 2,659 stars and Stoat having 3,406 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Stoat has 399 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Stoat is growing faster, adding 69 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 12 stars for Quiet (+0.5%). Stoat is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Quiet last updated 1 day ago and Stoat 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Quiet uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS while Stoat leverages Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Quiet beginning 5 years ago and Stoat 5 years ago.
Quiet is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.
Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs