What is the main difference between Quiet and Stoat?

Quiet and Stoat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Quiet or Stoat?

The choice between Quiet and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Quiet to Stoat?

Migration between Quiet and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn more

Quiet vs Stoat

Learn how Quiet and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Quiet

Quiet is a peer-to-peer messaging app that syncs messages directly between devices over Tor, with no central server, no phone number required, and no metadata leaks.

Visit Quiet Read more

2,663stars+4(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
11.3.1
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
tryquiet/quiet

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,460stars+73(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.16.2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Detailed Comparison

Both Quiet and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Quiet having 2,663 stars and Stoat having 3,460 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Stoat has 407 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Stoat wins

Growth Momentum

Stoat is growing faster, adding 73 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 4 stars for Quiet (+0.2%). Stoat is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Quiet last updated 7 days ago and Stoat 3 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Quiet uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS while Stoat leverages Rust.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Quiet beginning 5 years ago and Stoat 5 years ago.

Quiet wins

Licensing

Quiet is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.

Stoat wins

Hosting & Deployment

Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.