Learn how Mattermost and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Quiet, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Quiet in community adoption with 36,928 stars compared to 2,597 stars on GitHub. This 14.2x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,654 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 13 hours ago and Quiet 3 days ago.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Quiet which began 4 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Quiet is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces.
Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs