Learn how Mattermost and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 4 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 36,323 stars compared to 2,534 stars on GitHub. This 14.3x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,547 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Mattermost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Mattermost is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mattermost beginning 11 years ago and Wire 10 years ago.
Wire is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces while Wire extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.