Learn how Stoat and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both Stoat and Wire have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Stoat having 3,247 stars and Wire having 2,543 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Stoat has 381 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Stoat is growing faster, adding 71 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 3 stars for Wire (+0.1%). Stoat is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Stoat shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Wire was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests Stoat is being more actively maintained.
Wire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests Wire may have more mature features and established processes.
Wire is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.