What is the main difference between Fluxer and Stoat?

Fluxer and Stoat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Stoat?

The choice between Fluxer and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Stoat?

Migration between Fluxer and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Fluxer vs Stoat

Learn how Fluxer and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

10,119stars+315(+3.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
15 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
2026.823.155228
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

Sponsor Fluxer ongithub.com

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,247stars+71(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.15.1
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Sponsor Stoat onko-fi.com

Detailed Comparison

Fluxer appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 10,119 stars compared to 3,247 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Fluxer has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 718 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Fluxer wins

Growth Momentum

Fluxer is growing faster, adding 315 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 71 stars for Stoat (+2.2%). Fluxer is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 15 hours ago and Stoat 3 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Ruby.

Stoat wins

Project Maturity

Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 8 months ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.

Fluxer wins