What is the main difference between Fluxer and Stoat?

Fluxer and Stoat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Stoat?

The choice between Fluxer and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Stoat?

Migration between Fluxer and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Visit Docmost

Learn more

Fluxer vs Stoat

Learn how Fluxer and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

Stars
9,373
Forks
589
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
6 months
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

91/100

View Repository

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

Stars
3,105
Forks
364
Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
5 years

Activity score

87/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Fluxer appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 9,373 stars compared to 3,105 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Fluxer has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 589 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 1 day ago and Stoat 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Ruby.

Stoat wins

Project Maturity

Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 6 months ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.

Fluxer wins

Licensing

Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.

Fluxer wins

Hosting & Deployment

Fluxer provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Stoat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.