What is the main difference between Fluxer and Rocket.Chat?

Fluxer and Rocket.Chat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Rocket.Chat?

The choice between Fluxer and Rocket.Chat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Rocket.Chat?

Migration between Fluxer and Rocket.Chat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Fluxer vs Rocket.Chat

Learn how Fluxer and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

10,035stars+289(+3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
2026.819.173629
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

Sponsor Fluxer ongithub.com

Rocket.Chat

Open source communication platform combining messaging, voice, video, and AI for organizations that need full data control, air-gapped deployments, and zero-trust security.

Visit Rocket.Chat Read more

46,005stars+177(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
8.7.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
rocketchat/rocket.chat

Detailed Comparison

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Fluxer, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Rocket.Chat wins

Community & Popularity

Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Fluxer in community adoption with 46,005 stars compared to 10,035 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,804 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Fluxer wins

Growth Momentum

Fluxer is growing faster, adding 289 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 177 stars for Rocket.Chat (+0.4%). Fluxer is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 8 hours ago and Rocket.Chat 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses Python, Golang, Rust, Ruby while Rocket.Chat leverages SCSS, Meteor.

Rocket.Chat wins

Project Maturity

Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 8 months ago. This 10.8-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.

Rocket.Chat wins

Licensing

Rocket.Chat uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Fluxer's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fluxer also focuses on Encrypted Communication while Rocket.Chat extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.

Comparable