Learn how Fluxer and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Fluxer and Zulip have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zulip leads in popularity with 25,730 stars vs 10,035 stars for Fluxer. The 156% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,082 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Fluxer is growing faster, adding 289 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 207 stars for Zulip (+0.8%). Fluxer is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 8 hours ago and Zulip 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses JSX, Golang, Rust.
Zulip has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 8 months ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests Zulip may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Zulip uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fluxer also focuses on Encrypted Communication.
Both Fluxer and Zulip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs