Learn how Wire and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 4 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Zulip appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zulip significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 25,077 stars compared to 2,534 stars on GitHub. This 9.9x difference suggests Zulip has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 9,797 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zulip shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Zulip is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Wire beginning 10 years ago and Zulip 11 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Wire is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zulip uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire also focuses on Encrypted Communication, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Zulip provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.