Learn how Wire and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 months agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
wireapp/wire
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
12.3License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zulip/zulip
Zulip appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zulip significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 26,143 stars compared to 2,556 stars on GitHub. This 10.2x difference suggests Zulip has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,512 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zulip is growing faster, adding 164 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 7 stars for Wire (+0.3%). Zulip is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Zulip shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests Zulip is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Wire beginning 11 years ago and Zulip 11 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Wire is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zulip uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire also focuses on Encrypted Communication, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Zulip provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs