Learn how Rocket.Chat and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 4 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 45,193 stars compared to 2,534 stars on GitHub. This 17.8x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,533 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Rocket.Chat shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Rocket.Chat is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Rocket.Chat beginning 11 years ago and Wire 10 years ago.
Wire is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Rocket.Chat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rocket.Chat also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces while Wire extends into Encrypted Communication.
Rocket.Chat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.