Learn how Rocket.Chat and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 46,022 stars compared to 2,543 stars on GitHub. This 18.1x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,818 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Rocket.Chat and Wire are moving at much the same rate, adding 150 stars and adding 3 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Rocket.Chat shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while Wire was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests Rocket.Chat is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Rocket.Chat beginning 11 years ago and Wire 10 years ago.
Rocket.Chat uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Wire's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rocket.Chat also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces while Wire extends into Encrypted Communication.
Rocket.Chat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs