Learn how Quiet and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Quiet, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Quiet in community adoption with 45,391 stars compared to 2,597 stars on GitHub. This 17.5x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,602 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Quiet last updated 3 days ago and Rocket.Chat 19 hours ago.
Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Quiet which began 4 years ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.
Quiet is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Rocket.Chat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet also focuses on Encrypted Communication while Rocket.Chat extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Rocket.Chat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs