Learn how Macro Chat and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Both Macro Chat and Quiet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Macro Chat and Quiet show comparable community engagement with 2,502 and 2,635 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Macro Chat has 271 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Macro Chat is growing faster, adding 1,926 stars in the last 30 days (+334%) against adding 18 stars for Quiet (+0.7%). Macro Chat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Chat last updated 22 minutes ago and Quiet 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro Chat uses CSS, Rust, Tauri while Quiet leverages Java, C++, Ruby, MATLAB, NestJS.
Quiet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Macro Chat which began 9 months ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Quiet may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Macro Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet extends into Encrypted Communication.

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository