Learn how Macro Chat and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Quiet appears to have several advantages over Macro Chat, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Quiet significantly outpaces Macro Chat in community adoption with 2,621 stars compared to 585 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Quiet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Quiet has 144 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Chat last updated 49 minutes ago and Quiet 2 hours ago.
Quiet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Macro Chat which began 9 months ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Quiet may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Macro Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet extends into Encrypted Communication.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs