What is the main difference between Macro Chat and Quiet?

Macro Chat and Quiet are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Macro Chat or Quiet?

The choice between Macro Chat and Quiet depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Macro Chat to Quiet?

Migration between Macro Chat and Quiet is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.

Learn More

Macro Chat vs Quiet

Learn how Macro Chat and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Macro Chat

Team chat app with inline threads, mention-based sharing, a unified inbox for chat and email, and an AI agent that works across your full workspace.

Visit Macro Chat Read more

4,175stars+3,460(+484%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2026.9.1.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Quiet

Quiet is a peer-to-peer messaging app that syncs messages directly between devices over Tor, with no central server, no phone number required, and no metadata leaks.

Visit Quiet Read more

2,642stars+12(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
7.3.5
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
tryquiet/quiet

Detailed Comparison

Both Macro Chat and Quiet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Macro Chat wins

Community & Popularity

Macro Chat leads in popularity with 4,175 stars vs 2,642 stars for Quiet. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Macro Chat has 408 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Macro Chat wins

Growth Momentum

Macro Chat is growing faster, adding 3,460 stars in the last 30 days (+484%) against adding 12 stars for Quiet (+0.5%). Macro Chat is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Chat last updated 8 hours ago and Quiet 6 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro Chat uses CSS, Rust, Tauri while Quiet leverages Java, C++, Ruby, MATLAB, NestJS.

Quiet wins

Project Maturity

Quiet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Macro Chat which began 10 months ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Quiet may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Macro Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet extends into Encrypted Communication.