Learn how Macro Chat and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.11.2.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 months agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
wireapp/wire
Macro Chat appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Macro Chat leads in popularity with 6,083 stars vs 2,557 stars for Wire. The 138% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Macro Chat has 565 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Macro Chat is growing faster, adding 1,543 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 7 stars for Wire (+0.3%). Macro Chat is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Macro Chat shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests Macro Chat is being more actively maintained.
Wire has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Macro Chat which began 1 year ago. This 9.8-year head start suggests Wire may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Macro Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Wire uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire extends into Encrypted Communication, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs