Learn how Jitsi and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video conferencing & virtual office tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 3 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Jitsi appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Jitsi significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 29,020 stars compared to 2,534 stars on GitHub. This 11.5x difference suggests Jitsi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Jitsi has 7,872 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Jitsi shows more recent development activity with its last commit 21 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Jitsi is being more actively maintained.
Jitsi has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Wire which began 10 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Jitsi may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Wire uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Conferencing & Virtual Office. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire extends into Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.
Jitsi provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.