Learn how Campfire and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Campfire appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Campfire leads in popularity with 4,518 stars vs 2,543 stars for Wire. The 78% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Campfire has 774 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Campfire is growing faster, adding 73 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 3 stars for Wire (+0.1%). Campfire is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Campfire shows more recent development activity with its last commit 18 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests Campfire is being more actively maintained.
Wire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 1 year ago. This 9.5-year head start suggests Wire may have more mature features and established processes.
Campfire uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Wire's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire extends into Encrypted Communication, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Campfire provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.