Learn how Campfire and Hazel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.5.6License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
once-campfire
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.0.2License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Campfire appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Campfire significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 4,803 stars compared to 729 stars on GitHub. This 6.6x difference suggests Campfire has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Campfire has 820 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Campfire is growing faster, adding 152 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 5 stars for Hazel (+0.7%). Campfire is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 2 days ago and Hazel 11 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Campfire beginning 1 year ago and Hazel 2 years ago.
Campfire uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hazel's FSL-1.1-ALv2 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging.
Both Campfire and Hazel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs