What is the main difference between Campfire and Hazel?

Campfire and Hazel are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Campfire or Hazel?

The choice between Campfire and Hazel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Campfire to Hazel?

Migration between Campfire and Hazel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Campfire vs Hazel

Learn how Campfire and Hazel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Campfire

Install your own group chat system with @mentions, DMs, and mobile support. One-time purchase, no monthly fees. Includes full source code for customization.

Visit Campfire Read more

4,835stars+48(+1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v1.5.10
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
once-campfire

Hazel

Team chat for developers with threads, full-text search, keyboard-first navigation, GitHub and Linear previews, desktop apps, and message sync with Slack and Discord.

Visit Hazel Read more

738stars+12(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.1.3
License
FSL-1.1-ALv2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/hazel

Detailed Comparison

Both Campfire and Hazel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Campfire wins

Community & Popularity

Campfire significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 4,835 stars compared to 738 stars on GitHub. This 6.6x difference suggests Campfire has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Campfire has 829 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Hazel wins

Growth Momentum

Hazel is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 48 stars for Campfire (+1%). Hazel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 4 hours ago and Hazel 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Campfire uses Ruby while Hazel leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Kotlin, Tauri, Tanstack Start.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Campfire beginning 1 year ago and Hazel 2 years ago.

Campfire wins

Licensing

Campfire uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hazel's FSL-1.1-ALv2 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable