Learn how Buzz and Hazel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v0.5.30License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
block/buzz
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.1.3License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Buzz appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Buzz significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 37,482 stars compared to 738 stars on GitHub. This 50.8x difference suggests Buzz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Buzz has 4,951 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Buzz is growing faster, adding 1,423 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 12 stars for Hazel (+1.7%). Buzz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Buzz last updated 4 hours ago and Hazel 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Kotlin, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Buzz uses Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, Dart while Hazel leverages Tanstack Start.
Both projects started around the same time, with Buzz beginning 8 months ago and Hazel 2 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Buzz is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Hazel uses FSL-1.1-ALv2. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging.
Both Buzz and Hazel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs