What is the main difference between Cinny and Hazel?

Cinny and Hazel are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cinny or Hazel?

The choice between Cinny and Hazel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cinny to Hazel?

Migration between Cinny and Hazel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Cinny vs Hazel

Learn how Cinny and Hazel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Cinny

Cinny offers a simple, elegant, and secure interface for Matrix-based conversations, protected by end-to-end encryption.

Visit Cinny Read more

3,945stars+38(+1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v4.12.8
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
cinnyapp/cinny

Hazel

Team chat for developers with threads, full-text search, keyboard-first navigation, GitHub and Linear previews, desktop apps, and message sync with Slack and Discord.

Visit Hazel Read more

729stars+5(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.0.2
License
FSL-1.1-ALv2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/hazel

Detailed Comparison

Cinny appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Cinny wins

Community & Popularity

Cinny significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 3,945 stars compared to 729 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Cinny has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cinny has 600 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Cinny wins

Growth Momentum

Cinny is growing faster, adding 38 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 5 stars for Hazel (+0.7%). Cinny is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 7 hours ago and Hazel 11 days ago.

Cinny wins

Project Maturity

Cinny has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 4.1-year head start suggests Cinny may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Hazel uses FSL-1.1-ALv2. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Encrypted Communication, Decentralized Social Networks.

Hazel wins

Hosting & Deployment

Hazel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cinny may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.