What is the main difference between Cinny and SAMA?

Cinny and SAMA are both encrypted communication tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cinny or SAMA?

The choice between Cinny and SAMA depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cinny to SAMA?

Migration between Cinny and SAMA is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Cinny vs SAMA

Learn how Cinny and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.

Cinny

Cinny offers a simple, elegant, and secure interface for Matrix-based conversations, protected by end-to-end encryption.

Visit Cinny Read more

3,957stars+43(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v4.12.8
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
cinnyapp/cinny

SAMA

Open source chat server with end-to-end encryption, clustering support, and comprehensive messaging features for building real-time communication apps

Visit SAMA Read more

161stars+3(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
26 days ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
0.37.2
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
sama-server

Detailed Comparison

Both Cinny and SAMA have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Cinny wins

Community & Popularity

Cinny significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 3,957 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 24.6x difference suggests Cinny has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cinny has 604 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

SAMA wins

Growth Momentum

SAMA is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 43 stars for Cinny (+1.1%). SAMA is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 2 hours ago and SAMA 26 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cinny uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.

Cinny wins

Project Maturity

Cinny has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Cinny may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while SAMA uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging, Decentralized Social Networks while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.