What is the main difference between Mattermost and SAMA?

Mattermost and SAMA are both encrypted communication tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Mattermost or SAMA?

The choice between Mattermost and SAMA depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Mattermost to SAMA?

Migration between Mattermost and SAMA is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Mattermost vs SAMA

Learn how Mattermost and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.

Mattermost

Mattermost provides a flexible, open-source platform for secure team collaboration, designed for organizations with strict security and privacy requirements.

Visit Mattermost Read more

39,557stars+255(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v12.0.2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mattermost

SAMA

Open source chat server with end-to-end encryption, clustering support, and comprehensive messaging features for building real-time communication apps

Visit SAMA Read more

161stars+3(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
0.37.2
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
sama-server

Detailed Comparison

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Mattermost wins

Community & Popularity

Mattermost significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 39,557 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 245.7x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 9,093 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

SAMA wins

Growth Momentum

SAMA is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 255 stars for Mattermost (+0.6%). SAMA is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Mattermost wins

Development Activity

Mattermost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while SAMA was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Mattermost is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang, SCSS.

Mattermost wins

Project Maturity

Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.

SAMA wins

Licensing

SAMA is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging, Collaborative Workspaces while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.

Mattermost wins

Hosting & Deployment

Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SAMA may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.