Learn how Mattermost and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 36,224 stars compared to 152 stars on GitHub. This 238.3x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,531 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 9 hours ago and SAMA 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
SAMA is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Team Chat & Messaging while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.
Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SAMA may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.