What is the main difference between SAMA and Stoat?

SAMA and Stoat are both encrypted communication tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: SAMA or Stoat?

The choice between SAMA and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from SAMA to Stoat?

Migration between SAMA and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

SAMA vs Stoat

Learn how SAMA and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.

SAMA

Open source chat server with end-to-end encryption, clustering support, and comprehensive messaging features for building real-time communication apps

Visit SAMA Read more

161stars

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
0.37.2
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
sama-server

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,468stars+71(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.16.4
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Detailed Comparison

Stoat appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Stoat wins

Community & Popularity

Stoat significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 3,468 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 21.5x difference suggests Stoat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Stoat has 408 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Stoat wins

Growth Momentum

Stoat is growing faster, adding 71 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 0 stars for SAMA (0%). Stoat is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Stoat wins

Development Activity

Stoat shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while SAMA was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Stoat is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

SAMA uses JavaScript while Stoat leverages Bash, Python, Rust.

Stoat wins

Project Maturity

Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.

SAMA wins

Licensing

SAMA is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: SAMA also focuses on Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers while Stoat extends into Team Chat & Messaging.

Stoat wins

Hosting & Deployment

Stoat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SAMA may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.